1. <small id="dk2yl"><object id="dk2yl"><tr id="dk2yl"></tr></object></small>
    2. <meter id="dk2yl"></meter>

      <listing id="dk2yl"></listing>

      <label id="dk2yl"></label>

      a hand holding a cellphone: post.metadata.leadImageDesc post.metadata.leadImageDesc

      Not long after purchasing my first car with parking sensors, after a few delighted first days marveling at how they helped me park in the tightest of spots, I found myself in some situation where they were beeping incessantly, so I turned them off. A half-hour later, I listened for beeping that never came as I backed into a wall, bruising my ego and the bumper skin. In a New York Times op-ed over the weekend, psychiatrist Vatsal G. Thakkar tells a similar story in which he placed blind reliance on proximity sensors — in a car that didn't have them.

      He cites the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, who says, "Many drivers are not aware of the limitations" of driver-assist technologies, while one in five drivers have had an accident or near miss because they too fully relied on these systems.

      Thakkar points out something we often say at Autoblog: Driver-assistance technologies can be useful, but they require increased attentiveness, not less. It's not even a trust-but-verify situation — if you have these technologies, don't trust. Ever. Do have a thorough understanding of how they work, how they can be fooled, and be prepared to override them at a second's notice.

      One might ask: If I have to be so attentive operating these technologies, then why have them in the first place? Why not just ... be attentive? Good question. I think we all have a pretty good sense that the impetus for lane-keeping, adaptive cruise and various other systems, in part or in full, is driver distraction brought on primarily by smartphones and infotainment screens. Driver distraction is undoubtedly a big factor in our alarming trend of traffic fatalities. But as Thakkar asks, "Could technology designed to save us from our lapses in attention actually make us even less attentive?"

      In his concise piece, Thakkar makes the case that over-reliance on technology can be blamed for recent Tesla crashes, medical errors and even the recent crashes of Boeing 737 Max 8 jetliners.

      But his solution is one after our own hearts, and why we suggest you read his piece. The answer to all of the above is simple, engaging and beautiful — it's the manual transmission. When your brain and all four limbs are fully engaged in the driving experience, who needs beeps?

      So get one today, while you still can.

      Related Story: The 41 cars you can buy with a manual transmission in 2019(Provided by Car & Driver)

      a car parked on the side of a road: Difficult to find on dealer lots, tougher to resell to the masses of lazy commuters, and no longer necessarily cheaper or more efficient than their self-shifting counterparts, cars with manual transmissions nonetheless continue to stave off extinction. We think there’s nothing quite like the control and fun a manual transmission affords drivers, and to prove that the transmission isn’t as scarce as ominous statistics of decline might lead you to believe, we’ve gathered here every car that still offers a stick shift and a third pedal for the 2019 model year. (We cover row-your-own crossovers and SUVs in a separate installation.) The list of cars is reassuringly long, so stretch out your left leg and start swiping through to see it all.

      Why the manual transmission can save us from the machines originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 25 Mar 2019

      TOPICS FOR YOU
      Next Story

      Tesla announces improved battery ranges for some Model S, Model X

      Feedback

      Found the story interesting?

      Like us on Facebook to see similar stories


      Send MSN Feedback

      We appreciate your input!

      Please give an overall site rating:

      重庆时时彩注冊送彩金

      1. <small id="dk2yl"><object id="dk2yl"><tr id="dk2yl"></tr></object></small>
      2. <meter id="dk2yl"></meter>

        <listing id="dk2yl"></listing>

        <label id="dk2yl"></label>

        1. <small id="dk2yl"><object id="dk2yl"><tr id="dk2yl"></tr></object></small>
        2. <meter id="dk2yl"></meter>

          <listing id="dk2yl"></listing>

          <label id="dk2yl"></label>